Retrofit Options For K-Tron Gravimetric Feeder Users

Upgrade to the latest K-Tron feeding technology and performance at a fraction of the cost of new equipment

Were your K-Tron gravimetric feeders installed before 1989?

If so, chances are your process could benefit from a free, no-obligation Retrofit Review.

In recent years K-Tron has incorporated new technologies in its weighing and control systems, and wants to make these significant advancements available to customers with older gravimetric feeding systems.

For over twenty years, K-Tron gravimetric feeders have been designed to be upgradeable so that your process can benefit from the latest available technologies.

Why Upgrade?

Upgrading to SFT II or SFT III weight sensors and SmartConnex control system delivers these important benefits:

Remain competitive in your industry with the latest feeding technologies

Economical way to improve product quality and extend the life of current equipment

Avoid downtime, obsolete parts, and potential increased service frequency

Eliminate calibration

Improve feeding accuracy and consistency

Improve control and connectivity

Improve inventory trending

Who Qualifies?

Consider a Retrofit Review if your K-Tron gravimetric feeders (loss-in-weight or weigh belt) currently employ the following weight sensors or controllers:

Weight Sensors	Controllers
DMT DFT SFT I	6100 Series 7100 Series 8100 Series K10/KDU

Upgrade to What?

If your Retrofit Review determines you could benefit from upgrading, you'll receive a quotation including K-Tron's SFT II or SFT III weight sensors (depending on your installation), along with K-Tron's SmartConnex control system.

SFT II/III

The latest generations of this revolutionary digital weighing technology offer faster signal processing for more responsive feeding control and enhanced tolerance to vibration and electrical noise.

SmartConnex

Simple, tightly integrated control network with on-machine motor drive and feeder control electronics. LON or serial bus design with PLC/host connectivity and choice of operator interfaces.